Monthly Archives: December 2011


                           MY THREE BOOK CHALLENGES 2012

I will leave my comments in the box below; as replies for updates for how I’m progressing throughout the year, as well maybe do reviews on the books I found interesting and rewarding to have read.

(R) = Read

The Long Book Challenge

This one was made up by Debra’s Book Café and Bumblesby, on their youtube book channels and goodreads:
The challenge for 2012 is to ‘up the game’ and read longer novels
(mine would be from the local library) of books over 400 pages in length. 

1.The Blind Assassin by Margaret Atwood (627 pages) (R)

2. The Time of My Life by Cecelia Ahern (419 pages –
    large print edition) (R)

3. The Nonesuch by Georgette Heyer (523 pages –
    large print edition)

Read Non-Fiction Book Challenge

This is a challenge to read at least one book every three months
that is non-fiction (that has some historical/biographical value)
from the public library.

1. A History of English Food by Clarissa Dickson Wright



Read Contemporary Books Challenge

This challenge has been made up by me, to read at least six (adult)
contemporary books in a period of over six months, that has been
borrowed from the public library (thats not duplicated from the above
book challenges – it has to be a different book.)

Weblink as to what is meant by ‘contemporary fiction’ as a genre:
Postmodernism, Backgrounds and Definitions and Contemporary Fiction

1. A Single Man by Christopher Isherwood (R)




Read Chick-Lit fiction Book Challenge

This is a challenge to read at least one book every month
that is from the public library.

1. Monday to Friday Man by Alice Peterson (R)

2. The Black Violin by Maxence Fermine (R)

3. Pear Shaped by Stella Newman

4. Hotel Vendôme by Danielle Steel



Filed under Yearly Book Challenge

Paint Me Rainbows by Fern Michaels

Publisher: Thordike Chivers
Hardback: Large Print, 216 pages
ISBN: 1-40563374-3


Minet Library –


With nothing but her shattered pride and wedding dress, Jill Barton flees town after the heartbreak and humiliation of being left at the altar. While a charming country retreat in Washington State offers her sanctuary, its hard-bitten owner, Logan Matthews, does not. And soon Jill realizes that nothing is safe around Logan – not her secrets, not her desires and especially not her heart.


A romantic book with an young adult female with a can-do attitude and an accomplished alpha male. As it was published in 1981 at the beginning of the ‘anti-male’ feminist track from middle-class women, it was reflected in this book rather too well, because Jill, the main character was forever making ‘put-down’ comments regarding his, Logan’s male capabilities, and his macho attitude only occured once in the book, although I’m glad he refrained from getting in-touch with his ‘feminine side’ as that would’ve done me in I feel and I would’ve lost total respect for Logan if he had as the male central character, *phew* so that was his saving grace. Also, I didn’t like Jill’s character that much, and I think it was because as soon as she found out that Logan was wealthy from Aggie, the manner of Jill’s address to him suddenly changed, and I thought ‘gold-digger’ even though the author went to pains to say that she wasn’t, and that Jill was truely in love with Logan, I still didn’t believe it. The star of the book for me was ‘Doozey’ the dog and Aggie, the housekeeper, they kept me entertained throughout the book, without whom that book would’ve fallen flat and been regarded as a ‘typical’ romantic book with all its cliques. However, I really liked the Xmas theme of the book and all the warmth it brings to the season.

Leave a comment

Filed under Romance

The Lost Symbol by Dan Brown

Publisher: Bantam Press
Hardback: large print, 505 pages,
ISBN: 9780593054277


Minet Library –


NOTE: the origins and early development of Freemasonry are a matter of some debate and conjecture. A poem known as the “Regius Manuscript” has been dated to approximately 1390 and is the oldest known Masonic text. There is evidence to suggest that there were Masonic lodges in existence in Scotland as early as the late 16th century (for example the Lodge at Kilwinning, Scotland, has records that date to the late 16th century, and is mentioned in the Second Schaw Statutes (1599) which specified that “ye warden of ye lug of Kilwynning […] tak tryall of ye airt of memorie and science yrof, of everie fellowe of craft and everie prenteiss according to ayr of yr vocations”). There are clear references to the existence of lodges in England by the mid-17th century.




“…What I’m saying is this…two heads are better than one…and yet two heads are not twice better, they are many many times better. Multiple minds working in unison magnify a thought effect… exponentially. This is the inherent power of prayer groups, healing circles, singing in unions and worshipping en masse. The idea of universal consciousness is no ethereal New Age concept. It’s a hard-core scientific reality…and harnessing it has the potential to transform the world. This is the underlying discovery of Noethe Science. What’s more, its happening right now. You can feel it around you. Technology is linking us in ways we never imagined possible. Twitter, Google, Wikipedia and others — all blend to create a web of interconnected minds.”


I agree to a point. For what if it had answered or had made some sort of suspense or thriller element as a sub-context in the book regarding that of about the ‘God-Head’.

As the ‘God Head’ denotes the Divine Nature or Substance, set apart from the Trinity; as the ‘Word’ is set apart in Genesis in the beginning. As the ‘Godhead’ is a ‘substance’ of Divine Nature, that is a part of a Single mind, three into one converged energy, which acts with a Multiple mind purpose.

Then the book would have given another perspective on what the main character Robert Langdon might have explored, as Dan Brown’s theme within this book was regarding science, religion and the Freemason, that of two aspects that can be found to be: ‘transformation’ and ‘transubstantiation’ that is to change in substance as a person as to something beyond oneself.

As the ‘God-Head’ is mentioned in Acts 17:29, Romans 1-20 and Colossians 2:9 from the Wycliffe 1395 bible version and Tyndale 1525 bible version, which specifically gives that word to the reference of ‘Godhead’ that is a Middle English variant of the word ‘godhood’, and the ending ‘-head’, is not connected with the word ‘head’ as in terms of leadership, its something else entirely. Also John Wycliffe introduced the term godhede into the English Bible versions in two places, and, though somewhat archaic, the term survives in modern English because of its use in three places of the Tyndale New Testament (1525) and into the Authorized King James Version of the Bible (1611). For “…while three entities comprise the Godhead (state of being God), they are one in nature, purpose, and thinking (cf. Jn. 14: 8-11)…” it is mentioned within this book a similar premise; the Freemasons creed, the universal consciousness and the Noetic science.


And I’d say that just because the ‘Godhead’ hasn’t been delved into as much by authors, doesn’t mean that it doesn’t exist, just that its been sidelined in the realm of explored research and theories, and it could’ve tied into science, the Freemasons and religion within this book, and that is because as far as I know, the ‘Godhead’ doesn’t have a symbol, therefore its lost, and you’d have thought it would, being that everything else does of somekind, with an associated attribute of a symbolic classification, that started in the Age of Enlightenment during the 17th century, and they overlooked this one element?

Leave a comment

Filed under Crime/Thrillers

The Lost Book of Salem by Katherine Howe

Publisher: Penguin Books
Hardback, large print, 459 pages,
ISBN: 9781408430538


SOURCE FROM: Library Collection


Minet Library –

NOTE: the word Salem means in the Book of Genesis, ‘Salem’ is a name of place in which Melchizedek is king. Genesis 14:18 and in the KJV bible it renders this as “Melchizedek king of Salem, the priest of the most high God (El Elyon).” The Hebrew root Salem means “whole, complete” in the idiomatic sense of “at peace”.



The book was good. Instead of being written in just English though, it had the American dialect of New England, as well as the Old English from the 16th century to contend with when reading this book, so you had to be abit of an imagined linguist of being able to put each character and setting part into the context of the narrative. As as that of the Salem Witches stories within the book were written in Old English, that of the New England dialect, which even the main character had difficulty understanding what was being said to her in that twang, but then you relaxed when it got to the 20th century English language that is well understood currently.

My interest was peaked in trying to work out the motive for the Witch hunts, as we had learnt just some of this from my history class when it came to the Reformation and how the Witches were caught up in this, so much so that I thought I’d put my own theory forward:


The motive for the witch hunt goes back in history to Margery Kempe (1373-1438) who made a pilgrimage during 1413, going to the shrine of St. Thomas a Becket in Canterbury. At a local Monastery, a monk challenged her, asking what she knew of God, and she answered that she knew. The monk asked her to name his secret sin, and she replied “Lechery.” He was taken aback, and asked “With single women or married.” “Married,” she replied, and he cried, “She is a right holy woman!”


Now what if this piece of verbal exchange certainly carried around Britain as gossip, as the Kempe woman was examined in public by the Monk within earshot of others, and therefore God’s secret sin was no more a secret then. And any woman of certain social class wanted to be the next Mary, that God sought for sexual liaisons, and if not him the next best would’ve been Christ. And what if then God could be entrapped by ‘cunning women’ feared the human men, they’d see this as an affront to their masculinity also, although I guess not much has changed from this thought in Western society. The outcome?

Forward to 1692, and what if the educated women of Salem, got to know what the town name of Salem meant in Hebrew, that is being God, whole and complete and in peace. The townspeople would all have had differing motives: rivalry at its very worse and sexual competition. The males wanting to show God how virtuous they were, the young females how innocent they were, and older women how righteous they were. All stated in this novel ‘the lost Book of Salem’ through the character of Deliverance Dane, a God fearing woman.

And although the main character Connie was able to read peoples’ outward manifestations of impression and expression, she couldn’t read their inner motives. But the accused witch Deliverance Dane could, on pages 311 and 402 as to the given examples within the book without resorting to spellbinding, for she was a healer only.

So why the witch-hunt in a far-off place such as Salem, New England, says it in the name really and in the behaviour of the residence back then. They wanted to root God in time and in that location, they did an incantation that went wrong, and didn’t want to reverse it, if God could be kept among them, but wait, healing women could free God, that was a risk they couldn’t take, for the Holy Ghost has many benign gifts that he empowers females with as beknown, hence only those that were visibly in their spiritual gifts were charged; the healing women accused of witchcraft being put to death by hanging.

I truly believe that no-one really believed that the Holy Spirit exists, for it astounds me that no-one asked for his help and some still don’t today. But there is a clue within the book of the Holy Ghost’s presence being that of the ability of ‘Divination’ which includes ‘prayer intentions’ such as:

Arise, Lord! Lift up your hand, O God
Do not forget the helpless.
Why does the wicked man revile God?
Why does he say to himself,
“He won’t call me to account?”
But you, O God, do see trouble and grief;
You consider it to take it in hand.
The victim commits himself to you;
You are the helper of the fatherless.
Call him to account for his wickedness
That would not be found out.
The Lord is King forever and ever;
Your hear, O Lord, the desire of the afflicted;
You encourage them, and you listen to their cry
Defending the fatherless and the oppressed
In order that those who are of the earth,
may terrify no more.

(Psalm 10 v.12-18)

And mentioned in the book on page 374 of “…Will? It was not quite, but almost. Intention. In the book it was called variously ‘technick, crafte and authoritie.’ So there would’ve been no need for persecutions

Leave a comment

Filed under Crime/Thrillers, Historical

The Celibate by Michael Arditti

Paperback: 340 pages
Publisher: Arcadia Books
ISBN: 978-1906413224


SOURCE FROM: Library Collection

Minet Library –



As the author, as to and through his main character conveyed a significant insight about all manner of subjects, but less on experience, therefore he had ‘Specific Understanding’ that is the main character that he himself admits. For it was picked up on that they, both the author and main character lacked and felt contemptuousness of those that do have the ability of ‘Sensed understanding’ internally regarding meanings gathered from awareness, which the author through the main character admits on page 212 when assessing that of another person, “that there is a gulf between ‘Sense-Knowledge and that of ‘Revelation Knowledge’ for he laments that ‘Sense-knowledge could never tell us which came first;” true, as it tells what is, where is, there is, and how is, and most importantly why is it so.

However, in modern times is given more credence in terms of acceptance when done as a self-confession rather than from any type of meaningful-interaction with reflection.

As there are three regards which applies to ‘Sense-Knowledge’ particularly as you read this book, or a book that is complex, is that it should be borne in mind with sensitivity as to:

Social Causality – reflecting on the causal influence regardless of who actually begins the interaction as it gives rise to impression about behaviour and its causes.

Temporal Contingency — as to the interaction with each other by eliciting our behaviour in that we may understand a greater number of traits in others than in ourselves.

Spatial Proximity — creates the perception of intentionality, the reader is ‘figural’ here which gives a tendency for the reader making out the purposes, the contexts and working with it.

As the character says: “Its hard to gain a perspective from a position of partial truth. And yet there are so many truths even as there are many stories. And at some point they must all connect. I used to think that that would only be in death; but I’m now convinced that as I reach out to more and more people, so I’ll come to understand their stories, and the partial truths will make more sense.” (page 247-278) Hence my reading was in the style of being nuanced in thought, that is just as much as the author’s were multi-complex in the contents.

To which I state that ‘Sense-knowledge’ is a virtue, which when a reader masters how to judge a book regardless of subject matter, just as much as they must know how to arrive at an understanding of its contents, that is no matter the subjectivity of it, the outcome of which is that there must be resolutions being stated in terms of shared critiques that builds upon awareness in having social perspectives that is insightful.

Leave a comment

Filed under Contemporary

The Book of Tomorrow by Cecelia Ahern

The End of Mr Y by Scarlett Thomas
Paperback: 396 pages
Publisher: Canongate Books Ltd
ISBN: 978-1847670700

Author Website:

Source from: Home Library Collection

The Book of Tomorrow by Cecelia Ahern
Paperback: 384 pages
Publisher: Harper edition
ISBN: 978-0007233717

Author Website:

Source from: Library Collection

Minet Library –




Both characters are searching for something that’s missing in their lives.

Both books deal with the spiritual supernatural element within their lives.

Both book characters have to deal with virtues and vices; in the ‘Book of Tomorrow’ its lies and in the ‘End of Mr Y’ its about truth.

Both books deal with also the infliction of words rather than their empowerment; as the ‘Book of Tomorrow’ dealt with the thoughts from speech and the ‘End of Mr Y’ that of the thoughts from the written word.

Both books I felt was dealing with something beyond them. Ultimately they had or were facing choices;

In the ‘Book of Tomorrow’ it was a matter of chance, faith and the possibility of understanding, from that of a personal perception. That is it mattered to her what she thought.

In regards to the ‘End of Mr Y’ it was a matter of risk, rational and the possibility of being understood, from that of a social perception. That is it mattered what others thought.


In the ‘Book of Tomorrow’, the interest lay in the apparent paradox, the basis of which lies in the difference between the nature of our experiences and our knowledge of how those experiences are caused.

In the ‘End of Mr Y’, its about the conflict between our everyday life experiences of objects and an analysis of how these experiences come to exist. It looks to enquire how the human being creates a coherent perceptual world out of a maze of physical impingements.

Thus from the readers perception from both books, its about our experiences which is dependant upon our active role as played out as the ‘Perceiver’ who in terms of the influence sets or has the expectation to achieve a structure from the books, from what maybe ambiguous or withheld from us as the reader.

And this is because our world of experience has stability in the constancies of perception which bears some relation to external events, in other words the perceptual act can be said to generate understanding that we can use as a basis for action. The connotation of meaningful here is that structure and stability are probably necessary for meaning to exist.

So the role of the ‘Perceiver’ is in affect to verify, endorse and validate the perceptions of people, behaviour and context and how these are interpreted, and may differ in a) what it being paid attention to, b) how they label, categories and relate to what they have observed and c) what inferences they draw from the person, behaviour or situation.

And you gain that concept from reading both these books, for both in the ‘Book of Tomorrow’ it was from a philosophical perceptive. Whilst in the ‘End of Mr Y’ its was from a psychologist perceptive. As both these field of study have been intrigued with the nature of the human perceptual process, and its given in this way from the books I’ve just read for example in:

‘The Book of Tomorrow’ its on page 417; “I constantly wonder how much of my life I would have learned if it hadn’t been for the book. Sometimes I think I would have found out sooner or later, most of the time I think that’s what the book’s purpose was, because it most certainly had a purpose. It led me to here. It helped me discover the secrets that made me a better person.”

And in ‘The End of Mr Y’ its on pages 16 and 18; “And I read the opening line of the preface, first in my head, and then aloud, as another train rattle along outside: “The discourse which follows may appear to the Reader as mere fancy or as a dream, penned on waking, in those fevered moments when one is still mesmerised by those conjuring tricks that are produced in the mind once the eyes are closed” as most “of his ideas were about the development and nature of thought, particularly scientific thought, and he often described his fictional works as ‘Experiments of the Mind’…”

That is, one is curious about their contact with the outside world and wonder how their experiences are caused and to what degree they reflect the world accurately. This is found within the book ‘The End of Mr Y’ in this concept.

One is the nature of our experiences and the other is our knowledge of how these experiences are caused by ourselves from reflection. This is found within the book ‘The Book in Tomorrow’ as a concept.

So there are questions posed of: “how do you dispose of a book once you’ve read it? As asked in the ‘Book of Tomorrow’ and in the ‘End of Mr Y’ it is asked: “what would happen if those who read my book not only discover but find some way to alter it?”

What say I or You.

Leave a comment

Filed under Science Fiction